http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/ Cult Labs is the friendliest forum on the web for discussing the latest cult releases, particularly from Shameless Screen Entertainment and Arrow Video. en Sun, 19 May 2013 01:52:33 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/images/misc/rss.jpg http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/ http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/293-what-has-hd-done-us.html Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:10:18 GMT Hello again, well the second installment of my blog has taken rather longer in coming than I had first hoped, and its on a totally different subject... Hello again, well the second installment of my blog has taken rather longer in coming than I had first hoped, and its on a totally different subject than I’d intended. I’ve decided to write down my thoughts (as a humble user) about high definition, specifically blu-ray, and list what I have found to be the pros and cons of the format. With the Arrow release of Dawn of the Dead on blu-ray looming hopefully this may help people to decide if the switch to HD is really worth it.

Ok lets start with the cons.

First of all straight off the bat its expensive (as a lowely projectionist living in London I‘m not exactly rolling in the moolah and chose to sell my Wii to upgrade to Blu-Ray). If you don’t own a HD or HD Ready T.V then you have to upgrade (between £300-£700 for a decent sized mid range one), you have to buy the player itself (£150 - £200 for a decent model though you can spend a lot more) and then anything you want to watch in HD you have to re-buy on blu-ray (with most decent titles being in the £15-£20 range). I’ve seen some of the pictures of peoples DVD collections on this forum and I’m sure that people with 500+ DVDs do not relish the idea of re-buying everything again on a new format (not to mention a lot of the obscure horror titles are yet to get a release, but here’s hoping). Also if you want to make use of the high definition surround tracks you’ll need a 5.1 system (although this isn’t necessary and I didn’t need to upgrade my surround system to play either the Dolby or DTS HD audio).

The next con is something I did not know about until I had been using my player for a few months. Some disks do not work straight out of the box. The first problem I had was with Terminator 2 Skynet edition. I went thought 2 copies before I found out there was not a disk error but I needed to update the firmware on my player. I had a similar problem with Crank 2 and found out I had to buy a USB memory stick (with some players it’s a SD card) to get it to work. Neither of these problems were mentioned on the disks box and both required a lengthy search in blu-ray tech forums to solve, something less tech savvy users may not think to do. The Crank 2 one annoyed me most as I didn’t have a USB stick and had to go and out buy one (£10) before I could watch the film.

Another, smaller, but still relevant problem is the load time. I’m not sure if its just my player but some of the disks take an age to load, the already mentioned T2 Skynet Edition is a particular offender along with The Dark Knight.

My final con is a personal one, I don’t really like those horrible little blue moulded plastic boxes. Though I have to say they’ve grown on me slightly since I first saw them. I just try to get as much stuff in steel box or other packaging as I can.

Right, so those are the cons as I see them, and keeping them in mind we can say…

What has HD done for us?

I was going to leave my first pro to the end, but I just can hold back, it’s the big one, picture quality. When Blu-Ray (and of course the now totally dismembered and rotting corpse of HD DVD) was released I thought to myself, ’the upgrade in quality from VHS to DVD was obviously huge, but HD cant really be that much better than DVD’. I will admit that I was wrong. The first time I watched Halloween on Blu-Ray I was completely blown away by the image quality. Every little detail is unearthed, stuff that I thought was down to the quality of the original film print is shown to be because of the limitations of the DVD format. I’ve always maintained that Halloween is on of the best crafted, best shot horrors of all time and the Blu-Ray format hammers this truth home.
Its not just Michael Myers who gains from the astounding picture quality of blu-ray, John Carpenters The Thing is an equal beneficiary. Rob Bottins special effects have never looked better and the snow scenes look so crisp you’d be forgiven if you mistakenly thought Carpenter had gone back out and re-shot them with the latest HD camera. Another film that has cleaned up astonishingly well is Army of Darkness, the film prompted me to write this blog. Bill Popes cinematography looks stunning, the colours are so vivid, and who doesn’t want to see old three stooges jokes in HD?
There is a slight problem though, just because a film has been released on Blu-Ray doesn’t necessarily mean its going to look its best, the people releasing it need to do their part with a great transfer too. My suggestion is to read one of the many online reviews that go into picture quality specifically before buying any disks. As an example I held of buying T2 until the Skynet edition came out as I heard the first version was quite frankly shit, but if you choose the right film Blu-Ray cannot be faulted on picture quality.

After picture quality the next big thing to judge a format on is sound. It’s true that the quality of you’re home system is going to be a big factor on how good the sound is but Blu-Ray does has a few tricks up its sleeve. If you can play the uncompressed Dolby and DTS tracks you are in for a treat. Every axe chop, every blood curdling scream and of course lets not forget, every chainsaw roar can be heard clearly. Evil Dead II is a good example of this as there are so many layered sounds some of them are lost in a compressed format like DVD, but no so with Blu-Ray. Again if the sound mix was poor in the first place HD cant polish a turd, but for most titles you will hear an improvement (maybe not quite as vast as the picture quality) over dvd.

The next bonus is one that most people probably know about. Backwards compatibility. You do not need any ugly combo drives to play you’re old DVDs and most blu-ray players will even upscale them increasing the picture quality (some people argue about whether up scaling is an improvement as it may not give a true image, I’m not an up scaling expert but there is a good article on it here.)

Finally another great thing about Blu Ray is the huge amount of space on the disc for extras. Like most film fans I’m sure everyone here loves commentaries, documentaries and making of’s and blu ray can offer a (little) bit more. By far my favourite blu-ray enchancment are the Picture in Picture (PIP) commentaries where not only can you hear the film makers talk but you can see behind the scenes footage and other video while watching the film.
I’m not overly impressed with the new menu systems, being able to bring up a menu while watching the film hasn’t really been that useful to me and the menu sounds are annoying. (plus these new fangled menus are, I think, the cause of the slow loading time) I’ve not tried any of the downloadable content, but overall I think blu-ray is an improvement when I comes to extras.

So that’s it, my thoughts on HD, hopefully I’ve avoided sounding too much like a Blu-Ray salesman and given fair weight to some of the formats problems (and if I've made any glaring technical errors hopefully someone will tell me). I really think that it is an improvement over dvd in every way (except those bloody cases) and if you can afford it its well worth the investment.
And for those people who say that blu-ray is a waste of money because soon HD downloading will take the market by storm I say, ‘Not if I’ve got anything to do with it!’ I enjoy having a physical collection of films, I like the artwork and the booklets and posters that come with them. A file on a hard drive will not replace that in my opinion, and by looking at the pictures of people collections I think people here agree with me.

Thanks for reading my blog. Hopefully the next one wont take so long.

BioZombie

Just to let you know I am in no way using the best possible components for my HD setup and still get a great performance out of it. In fact I only have HD Ready not Full HD so I’m not getting the full potential. (HD Ready has a smaller image resolution that Full HD but is still a huge improvement over SD DVD) For anyone who’s interested I’ll list my equipment below.

Sony BD350 Blu-Ray Player (£179 from Richer Sounds)

Optima HD720X High Definition Ready Digital Projector (£500 from Richer Sounds, will need a new bulb in a year or so‘s time though and they’re not cheap)

Sony STR DE 495 AV Reciever (£100 from Richer Sounds about 3 years ago doesn’t include speakers) ]]> BioZombie http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/293-what-has-hd-done-us.html http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/245-horrific-memories.html Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:00:27 GMT This is my first ever attempt at blogging, I've always wanted to have a go. As this is the blog section of a film board I guess I’ll try to keep it relevant but I quite often enjoy going off on tangents so we’ll see.

I thought it might be fun with my first blog to write a bit about some of the films that first got me to love the horror genre. These are films that I saw when I was about 15 and spent most of my weekends renting horror films with friends. We saw a lot of rubbish, Hellgate is one that instantly comes to mind, but most were ****ing amazing. (I’m gonna spare you long plot outlines for any of the films because they films that I would imagine most serious horror fans have already seen, if you haven’t seen them than I’ll warn you there are some spoilers ahead)

The film that sticks most clearly in my from that time was Evil Dead. We passed it over many times when choosing films because we thought the demon on the front cover looked like some weird pirate but eventually we rented it when are small video shop was running low on 18 rated films (back then 15’s were strictly for wusses only ). My memory of my first Evil Dead viewing is that of a fast paced non stop thrill ride of violence, gore and scares, me and my friends had never see anything like it. It delivered in a way which most (horror) films only dream of. My experience watching Evil Dead is pretty much my bench mark for film enjoyment, I’m always looking for the next Evil Dead experience a film that leaves me totally exhilarated and craving for more (There are very few of these films the only time I am certain I had the same is experience at a cinema was when I saw Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels when I was 17)
The other great thing about my first Evil Dead viewing was that there was a trailer for Evil Dead II after the film. The image of a headless corpse running into a tool shed carrying a chainsaw above its bloody stump is still firmly burned (maybe carved is a better word) into my brain. There was no question which film we were going to rent the next weekend.

In the small town that I grew up in there was only one place that you could buy horror videos and that was at the local market, luckly the guy who ran the place couldn’t give a shit or not if you were 18 just as long as you had cash. It was there that I bought Dawn of the Dead (actually I traded my Sega Game Gear in for the whole Dead Trilogy). The version that was swimming around at that time was the so called ‘Dirtors Cut’ which I found out later is actually just an extended cut rather than a definitive Romero version. I loved Dawn of the Dead for two main reasons the action and the gore (is there anything more exciting and visceral for a horror fan than when you first see the biker be literally torn to pieces by the rampaging zombies). Dawn is definitely the film that all other zombie flicks must be judged against.
A few years ago I was lucky enough to see Dawn with a large audience and hearing the audiences reaction when Peter (Ken Foree) decides against suicide at the very end and fights back against the zombies was fantastic(the incidental music that plays while he fights back is my second favourite piece of music in any film the first being the weirdly happy Caribbean??? tune in Zombie Flesh Eaters), the rather feeble looking kick that Peter delivers to the first zombie was greeted with a huge cheer.

The last film that had a huge affect on me when I was younger was Halloween. It's the film that kickstarted my obsession with all things John Carpenter. I watched Halloween (on the night itself no less) on my own very late at night, and from the second I saw the flickering pumpkin and heard the sensational score (anther cinematic moment that is forever seared into my mind) I was terrified, but I couldn’t stop watching. In my opinion Halloween is one of the most technically perfect films ever produced. The opening sequence, where the young Michael Myers kills his sister, that appears to be one long steady-cam shot is sublime. From then on John Carpenter goes on to school everyone in the art of scaring people shitless, an art form he perfect in Prince of Darkness. There have been many imitators, but for me Halloween will always be number one when it comes to the slasher genre.

Ok, so I hope I didn’t bore you shitless with my first ever blog, I’d love to hear what people think about it. I’m already planning my next entry about Asian zombie films which should include a review of the film I’m named after.

Thanks for reading.

BioZombie ]]> BioZombie http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/blogs/biozombie/245-horrific-memories.html