View Single Post
  #6  
Old 3rd October 2008, 04:13 PM
Creepshow's Avatar
Creepshow Creepshow is offline
Cultist in Training
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, U.K.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincenzo View Post
Yes the controversy over The Trip was ridiculous. Watching it again recently in terms of actual footage content it barely merits a 12. No swearing, no nudity, no violence, no graphic drug footage. Even the LSD scenes themselves are mild, and the film's message is actually an anti-drug one.

Both Straw Dogs and Maniac were also rejected twice. The latter is still cut (58 secs) but could possibly scrape through next time round.

In terms of other pre-90's films that caused the BBFC problems over the years. Well, mention must go to Freaks, No Orchids For Miss Blandish, Victim, The Wild One, Peeping Tom, Lolita, Shock Corridor, Blow-Up, Ulysses, Women In Love, Killing Of Sister George, The Devils, A Clockwork Orange, Flesh (they simply rejected Trash at the time), Last Tango In Paris, The Exorcist (though only for video), Enter The Dragon (and most MA films), Death Wish, Emmanuelle, Salo, Ilsa: She-Wolf Of The SS (twice rejected), Caligula, Dawn Of The Dead, Life Of Brian (the BBFC had no problems but everyone else seemed to), Derek & Clive Get The Horn (rejected for excessive swearing), Class Of 1984 (heavily cut for cinema then rejected for video), Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom, Henry: Portrait Of A Serial Killer, and the video nasties of course.

Try the BBFC Case Studies for some excellent info on assorted problem films.
Great info, and a great link. Thanks!
__________________
CREEPSHOW: The Most Fun You'll Ever Have... BEING SCARED!
www.creepshowcreeps.com


Last edited by vincenzo; 5th April 2009 at 11:59 AM.
Reply With Quote