AU's Mordum (2003) - Page 3

jim corrupt · #21 28th February 2009, 07:25 PM

it really is that bad loops. and nah trench i wouldnt type it either.

Pete · #22 28th February 2009, 07:26 PM

Shit houses!!!

jim corrupt · #23 28th February 2009, 07:27 PM

just cos youre afraid to watch it loops......and yeh thats a dare!

Pete · #24 28th February 2009, 07:28 PM

dont want to i'm scared!

Pete · #25 28th February 2009, 07:34 PM

Serously though the amount of times i've heard about these extreme movies being undescribalbe and then seeing how mild they are.

Angel · #26 28th February 2009, 08:03 PM

Are you talking about the bathroom assault scene that appears near the end?
What was the age of the girl in the bathroom scene?

She looked over the age of 16 to me.

Sexual assault involving an under age actress?

Surely it must have been faked though.

Obviously I don't want to go into too much detail but I think that's what it was. I'm no longer in possession of the DVD so can't rewatch.

trench · #27 28th February 2009, 08:10 PM

The violence, gore and situations depicted in the AU films are extreme for the most part, but they're like water off a ducks back for lovers of extreme cinema. In fact we've all probably seen it done more effectively, and stylishly, in Italian cinema. But that scene goes beyond anything I've ever seen, and I'd never want to see a scene like it again.

There's no gore or violence associated with that scene either.

trench · #28 28th February 2009, 08:15 PM

Well naturally it was faked but I thought she looked much younger than 16. In fact doesn't Christie Whiles (or is it Michael Schneider?) whisper "It's okay baby, now you'll never have to grow up", or words to that effect, during that scene?

So yeah, what Angel said. Well, that and the fact that the kid is dead. Hideous.

Angel · #29 28th February 2009, 08:22 PM

Thanks Trench.

I was just getting a bit confused as to exactly what scene everyone was talking about.

Well it would be interesting to know how old the actress in question was but she still looked older than 16 to me.

I think even in the States sexual activity between adults and children on film is a serious criminal offence. I just can't believe they would do it.

I think that dialogue was meaningless, just their attempt to make out she was a minor ie trying to be outrageous, when in reality she wasn't.

jim corrupt · #30 28th February 2009, 08:24 PM

Id say a ****ing hell of a lot younger than 16.