Whilst I didn't know about this law, I still think that my point stands in that there must have been some need to pass a law to prevent this. Of course, it is highly probable I'm totally wrong
.
After all, the British government has zero power to actually stop animal killings occurring on film sets if the films in question weren't shot in the UK.
I also think that, once the animal has died in the shooting of the film, the government forcing the cutting these scenes because of cruelty is just the definition of pointlessness.
I mean, did the government really not have more pressing issues to handle than some ****ing horror movies?
I blame Mary Whitehouse.