Quote:
Originally Posted by hivemind  I was implying that Craig's first entry into the Bond franchise (Casino Royale) was made much more violent, and Bond's character portrayal was of a much colder, emotionless Bond. A psychopathic streak that the Bond producers prefered to promote. The producer's of Bond back in 1989 (LIcence to Kill) mixed the elements of the old Bond with the sauvie, sophisticated character, with a slightly more coldier attitude, similar to what Craig's Bond became in Casino Royale in 2005.
Well, the way the James Bond franchise is going, Bond is already subserviant to a feminist hierarchy. He's viewed as a dinosaur of past masculinity, and has no position being an Alpha male Bond anymore. I suspect the new Bond will have feminim attributes, over the more masculine.
When I say castrated, I mean that his maculinity and Bond's true sexuality, hetrosexual, will no longer be apparent. If you get confused by that, then you are flipping well lost. |
I thought the character in Casino Royale is quite emotional, something summed up by the final act with his resignation from MI6 to spend his life with Vesper and then his response to her death.
In this day and age, the Bond character as played by likes of Sean Connery, Roger Moore, and Timothy Dalton is 'a dinosaur of past masculinity', someone who, in the 21st-century, would be conspicuous and a bit like Austin Powers in terms of his ability to relate to those around him.
I don't know what you mean about his heterosexuality no longer being apparent as the previous Daniel Craig films have shown he's attractive to women and attracted to women. I'd be stunned if that doesn't continue.