Cult Labs

Go Back   Cult Labs > Cult Labels > Other Labels > Arrow Video > Arrow Archives

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st May 2010, 06:04 PM
Almar@Cult Labs's Avatar
The Big Cheese
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Inferno - Discuss the film within The Three Mothers Trilogy

I suspect most people would disagree but I prefer Inferno to Suspiria - at least entertainment-wise but where do you see it fitting within the Three Mothers Trilogy and can it even be called a trilogy?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st May 2010, 06:28 PM
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Default

I agree. Inferno is the better film, though that opening sequence from Suspiria is pretty much unstoppable. Inferno is Dario's masterpiece. It's even more amazing considering how sick he was during production. I'd rank the three like this:

Inferno
Suspiria
Mother of Tears

MOT is not far behind btw! I'm sure many will disagree with me there. To me, it's only flaw is budgetary (and a couple instances of admittedly goofy dialog). I don't understand the hate this film gets in some circles.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31st May 2010, 06:45 PM
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

I think that the problem with Mother Of Tears was that the fans expected something special in the vein of Suspiria or Inferno. What they eventually got was something that may have worked as a stand alone film (with a few tweaks here and there) but not in the context of the trilogy. it probably also didn't help that audiences in Italy allegedyl laughed throughout the film.

My own opinion is that Suspiria is the best film in the trilogy, with Inferno not far behind. Suspiria had a look about it and though the story, of what there is, is very simple, it draws me in from the beginning.

Inferno is a classic that, to me, is the crossroad between the giallo and his 'horror' period. There is a lot less use of light, but the stronger story and setpieces of eerie tension carry it through.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31st May 2010, 06:55 PM
dan dan is offline
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

i agree that inferno is the best of the trilogy, just edging out suspiria. mother of tears unfortunately came 15 years too late, by the time the film was made darios movies were in a steep state of decline and he no longer had the ability to bring that intangible factor that made the first 2 so special. it probably should still be owned to complete the trilogy but it simply cannot hold its own next to them
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st May 2010, 08:17 PM
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by User1138 View Post
I think that the problem with Mother Of Tears was that the fans expected something special in the vein of Suspiria or Inferno. What they eventually got was something that may have worked as a stand alone film (with a few tweaks here and there) but not in the context of the trilogy. it probably also didn't help that audiences in Italy allegedyl laughed throughout the film.
The problem was that people expected him to make the exact same film he made 30 years ago and were unwilling or unable to accept that he's changed as an artist in that time. Why would making a film like Suspiria or Inferno (both very different films themselves) be interesting to him now? He's already done that. His goal with MOT was to bring the story into the real world and I think he succeeded. I'd argue that the long steadicam shot following Sarah's entrance into Mater Lacrimarum's dwelling, in and out of the shadows and through hints of light, shows that Argento is perfectly capable of duplicating his mid-late 70's style any time he wants to. But he doesn't want to. For that I think he should be applauded. If I want to watch Suspiria or Inferno, I'll pop one of them in. I'm happy to have something different. As to the audience laughing at it, well so be it. That's the way it goes with modern cinema audiences. Do you think a screening of Suspiria or Inferno today would be greeted any differently? I don't.

My favorite part of Inferno: the double murder accompanied by Verdi's Va Pensiero. Absolutely stunning work. For me, this sequence is the highlight of the trilogy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st May 2010, 08:33 PM
Almar@Cult Labs's Avatar
The Big Cheese
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default

Absolutely agree on the Verdi sequence - incredible - a moment unique in horror film-making.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st May 2010, 09:46 PM
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd View Post
Do you think a screening of Suspiria or Inferno today would be greeted any differently? I don't.
After having seen a screening of Suspiria last year, I can safely say that no-one in that audience laughed. What I did hear as I was leaving was "there was no story" being said quite a lot by a modern audience.

Watching Mother Of Tears, you can see scenes where Dario has recreated shots from Suspiria and Inferno. The shot of Jessica Harper approaching the witches coven at the end of Suspiria is recreated with Asia in the tunnels at the end of MOT.

While I agree that it was right not to return to that 70's style of his movies, there was an illusive spark missing from MOT that it so badly needed. Whether this was due to budget, writing or studio intervention, I don't know, but it did affect the outcome and it has been something that has been sadly missing from Dario's work in recent years.

I still argue that this movie would have fared better if it had not been part of the trilogy.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31st May 2010, 09:56 PM
Ex-member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Default

Mother of Tears was enough evidence for me that Argento should bow out gracefully after inflicting such a film on the public.

The Card Player was a steep decline although it did have some good elements but Do You Like Hitchcock was appalling and I thought he couldn't get any worse until I saw MOT.

Inferno could be the highpoint of his career.

Suspiria does have some great moments but Inferno is relentless and is one highpoint after another.

I see all 3 films as separate entities and there is very little to connect them and all can be viewed without any knowledge of the others

Another thread mentioned a cut VHS .
I had the CBS FOX VHS which was uncut as was my recording from Sky Movies but is the cut tape a "widescreen" version that I had forgotten all about?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st May 2010, 10:07 PM
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

Fox Video released a VHS in Britain in the early 90's which was cut. I think the BBFC website quoted 20 seconds. The release was in widescreen.

I'm assuming that this is the one you referring too.l
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31st May 2010, 10:36 PM
dan dan is offline
Cult Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

its refreshing to hear that many other people prefer inferno over suspiria, the general consensus has always been that suspiria is the better film but it never was for me, suspiria is a classic but in my opinion inferno has always been argentos masterpiece, there is something that bit better than the rest, the whole film flows beautifully from beginning to end
Reply With Quote
Reply  

Like this? Share it using the links below!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Our goal is to keep Cult Labs friendly. If you feel discouraged from posting by certain members' behaviour then you can e-mail us in complete confidence.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
All forum posts are contributed by members of the site; Cult Labs cannot take responsibility for all content posted on the site. If you have an issue with content posted on the site please click the 'report post' button.
Copyright © 2014 Cult Laboratories Ltd. All rights reserved.