![]() |
|
Register | All Albums | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| ||||
| ||||
![]() Quote:
However, I'm pretty sure I remember Almar saying a few years back that the sleazier, more explicit covers sell better than the classier covers.
__________________ |
#22
| ||||
| ||||
![]()
I think that's an excellent cover which strikes the right balance between classy and sleazy, exactly as the film does.
__________________ ![]() |
#23
| ||||
| ||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#24
| ||||
| ||||
![]() Aside from Bouchet's nudity, I don't think it's sleazy at all.
|
#26
| ||||
| ||||
![]() That's the only bit that makes it a little sleazy and I wouldn't change that bit at all!
__________________ ![]() |
#27
| ||||
| ||||
![]() I hope no ducklings were harmed in the making of that cover Pete. ![]() |
#28
| ||||
| ||||
![]()
Looking at the cover again, it would seem more appropriate if it was the cover to Peeping Tom or Krzysztof Kieślowski's brilliantly erotic A Short Film about Love.
|
#29
| ||||
| ||||
![]()
While I'm not a massive fan of Panel A I understand where Shameless are coming from, it does cover a lot of the imagery from the film. Besides which Bouchet topless on the cover will entice a fair few buyers, don't forget that WE know the film isn't really that sleazy but the general buying public don't.
|
#30
| ||||
| ||||
![]()
In terms of in-store purchases, I don't know if it matters whether the artwork is 'good' or not as sales will be gained or lost on how interesting, appealing or eye-catching it is. I think this cover checks those boxes.
__________________ ![]() |
![]() |
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |