Sickest horror movies ever made

[goatboy]

Originally Posted by Angel

Thanks. Haven't seen the film but it does sound remarkably similar to Sex Wish, a film I have seen.

The knife point rape would have more chance of passing in an 18 then an R18.

Sex Wish was another roughie from the same time with Zebbedy Colt, along much the same lines but sylistically different (I dunno if anyone has used the word "stylistically" in relation to 70s extreme porn before, so theres a first). "Sex Wish" had the look of a Herschell Gordon Lewis film to me whereas "Forced Entry" had more of a grimy ermmm Abel Ferara feel.

The knife/gun point rape would be cut full stop, its a hardcore scene at 18 and cut from an R18 because of the link of sex and violence.

[goatboy]

Originally Posted by vipco

Definetly not my scene GB. I hate all porn.

I read about it in KFC and the thought of a studded thing on a drill well sounds pretty sick to me and as we were talking about Forced entry ........

Im not in to Kearns ( Death Tripping ? ) or Trangression film. . As a happily married man I find it to weird.

I dont even like to much nudity in film let alone porn.



What actually are films of Trangression.?
They crop up in some snuff related stuff i've read , but names like R Kearns , JP Orrige and Lydia Lunch mean nothing to me.

I'm pretty indifferent to porn, not my cup of tea but it doesn't bother me, likewise i have seem images from BTRH in "Killing for Culure" and possibly in "Cinema Sewer", and does look extreme, i think i read somewhere that Friedkin flashed up subliminal images from BTRH in "Cruising", that were cut out (I could be wrong there, but it rings a bell).

My understanding of the Cinema of Transgression, was a group of New York filmmakers in the 80's making super 8 shock films, kind of like a perverse nihilistic follow on on from the Andy Warhol factory. The likes of Rollins etc starred in them, preoccupation with suicide, self harm, torture, extreme bondage etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Transgression

[vipco]

Thanks GB.

[goatboy]

Another disgusting pseudo-art film that has to rank highly under the "Sick Film" banner has to be "Vase de noces", the subject/idea of the film alone has to be considered sick, although not particuarly graphic on screen, the absense of any sound adds to a real sense of unease and disgust.

I won't describe it due to its subject matter, but an alternative title which should tell you everything is "One Man and His Pig", hmmmmmm

[vipco]

There's definetly some sick shit out there mate , and its in demand.

[goatboy]

Originally Posted by vipco

There's definetly some sick shit out there mate , and its in demand.

Definately, but the odd thing with "Vace de Noces" was the sheer amount of times it was shown at art film festivals, even garnering awards, i may be wrong but it only seemed to raise cause for concern in Australia, i know it was shown in the UK as my old lecturer mentioned it in a class years ago, thats where i first heard of it, so i gather by being classed as an art movie and shown as such gave it a modicum of respectability, probably by those who never actually watched it, utilising the old "challenging the boundaries of acceptablity" argument conveniently used to seperate art from exploitation.

[goatboy]

Just found it on wikipedia, i spelt it incorrectly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vase_de_Noces

[vipco]

I have heard of this film before.
A guy I got my long gone Mondo tapes from had it.

Have you seen that 'MiddleEast Wackjobs ( not full title ) yet. I was offered it today but turned it down.
I've seen it before and its pretty sick stuff.
From the same guys behind Bum Fights.

[Angel]

Originally Posted by goatboy

Definately, but the odd thing with "Vace de Noces" was the sheer amount of times it was shown at art film festivals, even garnering awards, i may be wrong but it only seemed to raise cause for concern in Australia, i know it was shown in the UK as my old lecturer mentioned it in a class years ago, thats where i first heard of it, so i gather by being classed as an art movie and shown as such gave it a modicum of respectability, probably by those who never actually watched it, utilising the old "challenging the boundaries of acceptablity" argument conveniently used to seperate art from exploitation.

Apart from being banned in Australia it was also banned in New Zealand.

I don't think the BBFC have ever passed the film. Perhaps it was shown in private cinema clubs in the 70's/80's or film fesitivals. I haven't seen it but it sounds highly unlikely it would pass uncut today.

[Angel]

Anyone seen Michael P.D. Paolo's 1994 film Transgression?

Cut by nearly 9m by the BBFC when submitted in the late 90's.