The most offensive (sub) genre What type of film offends you most? Is it Cannibal or Mondo? Nazisploitation or Rape/Revenge? Or something else? http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...cDit4bSs-X5Q-Qhttp://viewingcrap.com/africaaddiodvd.jpghttp://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...YcTgjUlNMO-xxWhttp://www.wrongsideoftheart.com/wp-..._poster_01.jpg |
The Cannibal and Mondo movies offend me the most for obvious reasons. I know some find the Nazi movies extremely offensive but they've never bothered me because they are so ludicrous. John Hughes movies offend me too - they start off good and then start turning into the most sickly sweet films ever and by the end I feel like vomiting everywhere. |
Quote:
I find the whole modern Grindhouse genre offensive, there is so much quality original stuff out there why bother. I also feel these films lack true exploitation credentials as when you read interviews with 60s and 70s exploiters, it's all about the cash and pushing the limits within the confines of censorship. |
Mondo movie with the animal stuff......and Pattisploitation.Yeuch! |
I don't think there's any sub genre that offends me, unless we're talking about mainstream cinema. Dumb US comedy flicks offend me; basically any comedy that has a poster of Owen Wilson with his mouth open;) |
I don't find them offensive per se, but the Saw rip offs/torture porn bollocks of the last few years have bored me to tears. :yawn: Change the bloody record please. :frusty: |
Is Will Ferrell a subgenre? |
Quote:
|
The kind of film that passes for 'spoof' these days, you know the kind :cuss: . . . |
Hmmm...offended is a strong word and brings up connotations of conservative housewives being 'offended' by 'nasty' films on video. But moving away from that image....what offends? I'm actually struggling to think of anything that I've found offensive. Bloody hell, I must be even more jaded and depraved than I thought. :lol: I suppose extreme porn offends me, in that it seems so...I dunno....abusive. Not that I've really seen much, but what I have repelled me and I wondered how anyone could be turned on by such stuff. But each to their own and all that. The Mondo movies are in bad taste, exploitative, sensationalistic and certainly trading on both human and animal misery. But offensive? Repulsive and repugnant, yes, that's obvious. But do they offend me? Hmmm...not really. It's not my 'thing' but I can't say it offends me either. Interesting topic. Be curious to see how this thread develops. EDIT: Actually I can think of one film that offended me. Salo. It seems to positively revel in sexual perversion and paedophilia. I know, I know, it's a masterpiece. But I think it's offensive and pointless bollocks. There, I thought of something that offends me. |
ah Salo. its not for everyone;);). these ones "offend" me, i suppose... The Siege Pearl Harbour The Little Mermaid 9 Gamer Micheal Bay the never ending cycle of remakes mel gibson on the other hand, i have sat through what most mainstream movie fans (ie people who go to see jennifer aniston films...actually she offends me as well, one trick pony or what??) would consider "filth" eg snuff 102 etc, though these are usually the ones who offer to show me decapitations and the like on their phones....and IM supposed to be the sicko?? to conclude. the whole world's wild at heart, and weird on top ;) |
Quote:
|
Only subgenre that offends me are poor Hollywood 'horror' comedies.Like The Lost Boys and Cursed.Yeah,and Adam Sandler. |
The most offensive (sub) genre Probably family friendly horror, masquerading as real horror which I like, sentimental romcoms, with Hugh Grant, Jennifer Aniston etc. but THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY and ME, MYSELF AND IRENE are very funny due to the ott humour and so called bad taste anything by Michael Bay, 'popcorn crap' pathetic shite like ARMAGEDDON and INDEPENDENCE DAY with the Yanks saving the world...again |
I'm struggling to think if I've ever been offended by a subgenre of films. The Mondo movies are distasteful and I don't like them because of the animal cruelty, but I'd be hard pushed to say they were generally offensive. On the other hand, brainless action films which appeal to the lowest common denominator, generally directed by Michael Bay, are offensive in the way they treat cinema and cinemagoers, lowering the IQ of film as an art form and seeming to suggest if something is expensive enough, loud enough and full of plenty of CGI, it must be worth seeing as an 'event'. |
very little "offends" me... the majority of mainstream porn offends me on a personal level by the way that women are depicted as vacuous airheads that are all fake boobs and no brains, so I make a concious effort to avoid it...in exactly the same way that I avoid most "chick flicks" for more or less the same reason. Other than that I can't say I am offended by anything within the horror/exploitation genres...not as far as an entire "genre/sub-genre" goes at least. |
Hugh Grant offends me far more than the foetus scoffing scene in Anthropophagus! :nod: |
Quote:
And to add to the Brit Hall of Shame, I'll add Keira Knightley. ****ing hell, she's awful. I caught her in Domino and to say she was unbelievable is putting it mildy. She spoke like the Queen and with a body no bigger than a stick insect, I was hard pushed to believe she could capture hostile criminals. The entire film was a real endurance test. 'My name is Domino and I'm a bounty huntah.' Far too posh to be a ****ing bounty hunter. What was the casting director thinking of?? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I dislike most Nazisploitation films, but can't say they really offend me (as Pete stated most are just too ludicrous to be taken seriously) "John Hughes movies offend me too - they start off good and then start turning into the most sickly sweet films ever and by the end I feel like vomiting everywhere. " Ha, I second that. Also -Cheesy and manipulative dramas about autism/ disability/ mute kids etc. (most of them are just misinformed and out right offensive). -Movies where an obnoxious kid forms a special bond with lions/ice bears/whales/big foot etc (I'm not even sure why those films offend me, but seeing a fat kid playfully wrestle with a bear makes me want to punch somebody. Not to mention that these type of films are filled with laughable villains, endless scenes of kids climbing with their new animal pals through wilderness and predictable sappy endings.) |
faces of death, anything with real animal slaughter or real footage of executions as these films no matter how informative they pretend to be are made for profit and someone has to sit there trolling through footage finding what they consider the most depraved or disturbing. I don't like the cannibal movies, but thats more because I just find them boring and uninteresting. As for saw and all those films - they have there place, but there has been way to many rip offs. Saw 1 and 2 were good. |
Agree with the general sentiment here that I'm not offended per se, but certain genres-such as the animal abuse of the cannibal films and the nazi exploitation films- are certainly tasteless and exploitative, but I don't feel personally offended. If anything, I marvel at their making, and how little tolerance there would be today for such ideas! I <3 the 70s. :) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright © 2014 Cult Laboratories Ltd. All rights reserved.