Forum: The 2010's 
24th December 2011, 02:04 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888  I always thought a good ol' friendly debate was...
I always thought a good ol' friendly debate was central to discussion forums? Granted it's the Dracula thread, so I'll leave my thoughts there. But still, it's not unusual to digress in a forum which...
|
|
Forum: The 2010's
24th December 2011, 12:05 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888 And you're welcome to that opinion - it was...
And you're welcome to that opinion - it was indeed a mistake to make it the third of the trilogy. But there's a world of difference between 'inferior work' and 'rubbish' - I concur with the former,...
|
|
Forum: The 2010's
22nd December 2011, 03:55 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888 |
|
Forum: The 2010's
21st December 2011, 03:25 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888 See, I don't think it is generic, as other than...
See, I don't think it is generic, as other than an affectionate and glorious hark back to 70's/80's Italian horror it's still a wild and out there film. It appears to reference (intentionally or not,...
|
|
Forum: The 2010's
21st December 2011, 12:20 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888 I don't think anyone is disagreeing that it's...
I don't think anyone is disagreeing that it's unsuitable for the third in the trilogy, but I disagree that it is a bad film.
Take the dates, Suspiria ('77), Inferno ('80), Mother of Tears ('07)....
|
|
Forum: The 2010's
19th December 2011, 07:08 PM
|
|
Replies: 187
Views: 25,888 I really like Mother of Tears too. It's not...
I really like Mother of Tears too. It's not Argento at his peak, no, nor in the same league as Suspiria/Inferno (considering it's supposed to complete the trilogy). It's not scary either, and doesn't...
|
