Quote:
Originally Posted by springjack  That is not an excuse...
I think Almar is right when he says that people should no judge the quality of the print by images. A moving picture is always different.
But I think the comment by Nemesis is not the right one because I believe he´s trying to put people to rest that the Blu will be better.
I too want the Blu to be better but you sould not put DVD down...
DVD is still the favorite medium to many people.
There are great DVD´s with great image.
If the Blu turns out to be far better then why not the DVD be also great.
I believe this is the same master for both editions and, as I said before, judging the quality of a movie by some pictures can sometime be deceiving.
I´m not saying notting fawlty about DVD BEAVER but let´s just think that probably the images were captures with the wrong setting...
Once again, let me just say that all written above are just supositions and not direct remarks to no one. |
Springjack, let me clarify -
I was not trying to diss dvd as a format in any way and let me apologise if I gave that impression.
Nekromantik believed that the Beaver caps belonged to the Blu and he was basing his decision to buy on those caps; I was merely pointing out that all we had seen so far were the caps for the dvd. I was not trying to imply that "it's dvd - who cares?".
As to your point about judging by screencaps and Beaver's compression issues, I totally agree - you only have to recently look at the latest dispute over Peeping Tom on blu. It helps to have a whole variety of reviews upon which to judge the release.