10th March 2011, 03:27 PM
|
 | Cultist on the Rampage Good Trader | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1,545
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah@Cult Labs  I am sorry. I should have been more specific. I simply meant that no one was holding a gun to her head. Regardless of whether she did it out of necessity for money, she still had a choice and could have said no at any time. If she didn't want to exploit her unborn baby, as you put it, she did not have to appear in this film, whether she needed money/food or not.
The animals did not have that option, did not choose to be in the film in the first place, and that is why a lot of people see it as cruelty. | Nah Sarah, you were quite clear. 
__________________
Steelerik on Twitter .. look for me ;-)
|