20th October 2012, 08:58 PM
|
 | Cult Master Cult Labs Radio Contributor
Good Trader
Senior Moderator | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Irvine, Scotland | |
Quote:
Originally Posted by the blob  Well, if you read Hammer's analysis of the 1.77:1 version using different framing for different shots instead of a constant matte throughout, wouldn't you have thought they'd do the same with the 1.66:1 version if they approved of that method?
Their argument is that the technology to reframe like that wasn't available in 1957 so it would have had to use a constant matte throughout the whole film, so it's entirely logical to assume a 1.77:1 version from them would be cropped even tighter. | Arrgghhhhhh!
__________________
"Give me grain or give me death!" |