When it comes to the subject of films influencing people I do agree that no concrete evidence has ever materialised proving this, and I also feel that very often certain elements of the media use this as an excuse without any proof whatsoever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daemonia  A question, though - I'm to understand that the BBFC keep a copy of all submitted material on file. Aren't they technically, then, in possession of illegal material, if it does indeed breach the law? |
To my knowledge they keep documentation of the film (in essay/list form) rather than a copy of the film itself. Very often they don't know if a film that has been cut or rejected in the past will pass intact today until it's been resubmitted to them.
Do you feel as equally strongly about the MPAA?