View Single Post
  #612  
Old 26th May 2010, 11:43 AM
Zombie Dude's Avatar
Zombie Dude Zombie Dude is offline
Seasoned Cultist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Australia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Almar@Cult Labs View Post
Ok folks - well we can debate the merits of how the BBFC will react and the unlikeliness that they will change anything but if we don't ever say something then we can't complain that nothing moves forward.

Based on the efforts on here of everyone writing in Arrow have decided they have to try too and are sending in a letter as well. If you feel strongly please do so as well. It should be polite and we have to assume the decision will remain but in any democracy if you feel strongly about something - let the government body responsible know about it!
That's great to hear. I'm glad Arrow are also putting their foot down and expressing their distaste for the cut. Even if nothing comes out of it we at least get the satisfaction of saying we tried.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buggenhagen View Post
I don't really see the point in complaining to the BBFC about it either. As Vincenzo already said their hands are tied by the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937 which they have absolutely no power to change. I'm sure that some of the examiners would sympathise to some extent with fans being upset but it's a matter of law so what can they do? It certainly won't hurt for them to know that people are displeased but they'll just have to issue their standard response - which no-one can argue with.

If you really wanted to get things changed then the way to do it would be to contact your MP. Only through an amendment to the law will this be resolved - and the fact that the UK passed a law on the matter way back in 1937 shows how strongly people in this country care about animal welfare. Personally I'd love to see older films uncut and I don't have a problem with the cat & mouse scene for example (infact I think it's daft to cut such sections from films that were made in different times or with different considerations) but I can see why people do have a problem with it and why the law exists. I think that the best that could be expected would be some sort of amendment to exempt films over a certain age (maybe from before films were properly monitored or something) unless there was evidence of exceptional and sustained cruelty - even then I think such a change would be extremely unlikely.
Whatever the case, some action should be taken to let them know we're not happy. Maybe someone should contact the MP if that's what it takes.