Arthouse with REAL sex

[Daemonia]

Okay, I'll be controversial (what's new?). If I want unsimulated sex I'll buy porn. I personally believe that real sex should be outside the mainstream. Just my opinion. Two people ****ing isn't art. It's just two people ****ing.

[Prince_Vajda]

Originally Posted by Daemonia

Okay, I'll be controversial (what's new?). If I want unsimulated sex I'll buy porn. I personally believe that real sex should be outside the mainstream. Just my opinion. Two people ****ing isn't art. It's just two people ****ing.

You've got a point there!

Did you know? Mainstream movie and porn movie had a baby and they named it Radley Metzger's The Image.

Greetings!

[Daemonia]

Originally Posted by Prince_Vajda

You've got a point there!

Did you know? Mainstream movie and porn movie had a baby and they named it Radley Metzger's The Image.

Greetings!

Oh don't get me wrong, I wouldn't avoid a good film just because there's real sex in it, but I also find it a bit pointless. It's not exactly acting, is it? But I can understand that some filmmakers want to be as extreme as they possibly can and use it as a kind of statement. But still, as I said, I find it a bit pointless.

[Prince_Vajda]

Originally Posted by Baseball Fury

I thought The Idiots was body doubles as well?

Most arthouse real sex films tend to be pretty poor, 9 Songs was boring, Baise Moi was a joke, Destricted was only good for the Gaspar Noe head ****. Anatomy of Hell was probably the only one I've seen that I didn't hate (excl. the Von Trier films)

I totally agree with you on both statements.

However, I think Margo Stilley has a lovely bum.

Greetings!