Forum: The 1970's 
1st September 2010, 08:34 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 |
|
Forum: The 1970's
31st January 2010, 01:08 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542  Well, that's definitely a good thing, I reckon....
Well, that's definitely a good thing, I reckon. It's not a genre mag, so I don't expect them to focus too much on niche titles. It's just that when the mag first launched in early '99 the reviewers...
|
|
Forum: The 1970's
29th January 2010, 12:34 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 |
|
Forum: The 1970's
17th January 2010, 11:56 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 |
|
Forum: The 1970's
7th January 2010, 12:19 PM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 The more pertinent question is: was there...
The more pertinent question is: was there anything Ferman didn't cut?
On topic - I bet this film looked great on the big screen! I wish we'd have the Weinstein restoration shown over here in...
|
|
Forum: The 1970's
7th January 2010, 12:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 He'd ban himself outright!
...
He'd ban himself outright!
http://www.bbfc.co.uk/icons/bbfc/Rejected.gif James Ferman. Submitted in January 2010. Runtime 72 years. Rejected for objectionable content.
I apologise for the...
|
|
Forum: The 1970's
6th January 2010, 11:04 AM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 |
|
Forum: The 1970's
5th January 2010, 05:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 |
|
Forum: The 1970's
5th January 2010, 04:00 PM
|
|
Replies: 184
Views: 33,542 Have to agree with Vin on this one. Totally...
Have to agree with Vin on this one. Totally pointless. Like a ship without sails, like a car without wheels.... :D
Seriously though, I'm not generally against the concept of remakes, but this just...
|
