|
#11
14th April 2009, 10:33 AM
| ||||
| ||||
These covers are really great!
 |
|
#12
14th April 2009, 11:34 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
Really nice work.  |
|
#13
14th April 2009, 12:00 PM
| ||||
| ||||
|
Am I the only one who tinks all the Arrow covers are awful so far? They look like sexed up, gored up Lynn and Jeff cartoons!
|
|
#14
14th April 2009, 03:23 PM
| |||
| |||
|
I think all 3 are fantastic, HBTC being my favourite, though the Sleepless one comes a close 2nd.
|
|
#15
14th April 2009, 06:19 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
 I think there may well be a Marmite quality to them but one thing I do know - Sleepless artwork has up until now always been staggeringly uninspiring. |
|
#16
14th April 2009, 06:57 PM
| ||||
| ||||
|
Oh it has Almar but I just don't like the covers, Macabre looks fine but House and Sleepless don't look right to me. House especially, it doesn't have any naked ladies in it!
|
|
#17
14th April 2009, 07:00 PM
| ||||
| ||||
|
More's the pity! I like to think of it as following in the tradition of exploitation artwork taking questionable license of the films they depict. It would just seem a shame to put a sticker on the DVD saying - 'warning - no naked ladies!'  |
|
#18
16th April 2009, 10:41 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
Seems like a good time to reveal the flip side of the Sleepless artwork should you not fancy the distressed commuter version.
|
|
#19
16th April 2009, 10:43 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
I like both  |
|
#20
16th April 2009, 11:50 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
That makes the standard and the flip-side artwork better than any of the other releases!  |
 |
| Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |
Linear Mode
