Stephen@Cult Labs | 13th November 2015 08:31 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs
(Post 468061)
True, but I think instead of what other films could have been made with that $100 million, or even if the money was spent restoring and releasing 'lost' films (or ones which are only available in cut form) which require TLC and exposure to a wider audience. |
I don't see one film being more worthy of money spent on it than another (unless it's Twilight. Joke!). And after all, it's films like this that most people actually want to see, and make money for the studios, which at the end if the day, is all that really matters to them these days. I was meaning more about the money spent on any film would be better spent on more important things in the world (I know, a strange thing to say on a film forum [emoji4]) |