#51
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Sent from my MediaPad T1 8.0 Pro using Tapatalk
__________________ It says here you're a HERETIC |
#52
| ||||
| ||||
So presumably this will be a continuation from Halloween II and ignore everything else?
|
#53
| ||||
| ||||
As long as it's not called Halloween H40 Sent from my MediaPad T1 8.0 Pro using Tapatalk
__________________ It says here you're a HERETIC |
#54
| ||||
| ||||
they may as well call it Halloween III and if its ignoring everything else, have it that Loomis was killed in the gas explosion in part 2
|
#55
| ||||
| ||||
I don't know how I feel about this, tbh. How does this work? Don't like the idea of them retconning H20 out of existence, and won't this just be kind of a repeat of it either way? I don't see how they can just retcon Resurrection and not H20, as she killed Michael pretty definitively at the end of H20 otherwise. I guess they could just retcon it to say she survived Resurrection. I don't know, really. The continuity is going to be all over the fecking place even more than it is already. I think I'd be happier with Danielle Harris coming back! |
#56
| ||||
| ||||
Looks like it's true
__________________ People try to put us down Just because we get around Golly, Gee! it's wrong to be so guilty |
#57
| ||||
| ||||
|
#58
| ||||
| ||||
can't really remember Halloween Resurrection that well, is there any way she could have realistically survived?
|
#59
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
From what we can gather, they're pretending H20 and Resurrection never happened, and the new film will be a sequel to the original (or Halloween II), although no-one's quite sure. Tbh, I think it's a big mistake, and i'm disappointed that JLC would be ok with ignoring them, especially H20.
__________________ "Give me grain or give me death!" |
#60
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |