Cult Labs

Go Back   Cult Labs > Film Discussions > VHS & Exploitation > Censorship
All AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Like Tree1188Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 12th July 2008, 10:40 AM
Cult Acolyte
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belfast
Default

LOL
I believe him.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 12th July 2008, 10:51 AM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vipco View Post
IMO the slaughter of the ox was allowed as it had one of Hollywoods biggest names acting in the film plus it was in context with the film, and had a reputable director.
It didn't stop the BBFC cutting The Godfather when it was first released.

Spielberg is also one of Hollywood's most reputable directors, yet both 1941 and Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom also received cuts. Peckinpah was even bigger at the time yet many of his films received BBFC edits, including animal cruelty cuts to Pat Garrett And Billy The Kid - as did Roger Corman's Bloody Mama (which was initially rejected, then cut for violence, and cut for animal cruelty today). Even Clint Eastwood's Any Which Way You Can was (and still is) cut for animal cruelty.

Both Salon Kitty and The Cannibal Man had scenes filmed inside animal slaughterhouses, yet neither were cut for this reason.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 12th July 2008, 10:55 AM
Angel's Avatar
Cultist on the Rampage
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Didn't stop them cutting Heaven's Gate either for animal cruelty even though Michael Cimino was a big director after The Deer Hunter. The BBFC's policy on animal cruelty seem pretty clear to me.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:05 AM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Warren Beatty's Reds also received BBFC cuts for animal cruelty. As did the Oscar-winning Glory. Hollywood classics such as The Cincinnati Kid and Return Of The Seven are also treated no differently.

Even literary classics such as Tom Jones and Schlesinger's Far From The Madding Crowd are cut for this reason.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:06 AM
Angel's Avatar
Cultist on the Rampage
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Well there you go.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:09 AM
Cult Acolyte
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belfast
Default

There are scenes in Holocaust which are proven quick kills and Deodato claims he ' just kept the camera running' so that meets BBFC policy, yet like the turtles head , CUT!

The Other Hell, BBFC passed chickens head cut off, Bloody Moon? BBFC passed snakes head cut off, CH BBFC cut turtles head cut off. CH BBFC cut monky's head cut off.
Were's the clarity there.?
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:13 AM
Angel's Avatar
Cultist on the Rampage
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vipco View Post
There are scenes in Holocaust which are proven quick kills and Deodato claims he ' just kept the camera running' so that meets BBFC policy, yet like the turtles head , CUT!
He can claim all he wants but where'e the evidence that
he is telling the truth? You don't want your film to be cut then provide the BBFC with some evidence that what you are saying is true.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:22 AM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Deodato didn't exactly endear himself with his fondness for animals with the earlier Last Cannibal World either. Lenzi was just as bad. Literally ALL of the BBFC cuts to Deep River Savages are to animal cruelty and most of the cuts to Cannibal Ferox are the same. When it comes to animal cruelty they have nothing to be pleased about whatsoever and have no reason to complain when their films are cut for this reason.

John Milius has had non-stop rows with the BBFC over cruel animal treatment in films such as the original Conan, and UK video/DVD releases of The Wind And The Lion are still unavailable for the same reason.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:27 AM
Cult Acolyte
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belfast
Default

Is that the camel punch scene in Conan.?
That scene was sickening and bang outta order.
At least Deodato and Lenzi had justification for there scenes.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 12th July 2008, 11:29 AM
Cult Acolyte
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belfast
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel View Post
He can claim all he wants but where'e the evidence that
he is telling the truth? You don't want your film to be cut then provide the BBFC with some evidence that what you are saying is true.
An artist should'nt have to defend their work.

IMO Deodato and Lenzi have nothing to prove, its the censors who have to prove they , Deodato and Lenzi , were lying in their claims, personally I believe in Deodato's.case he was being truthful.

Last edited by vipco; 12th July 2008 at 11:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply  

Like this? Share it using the links below!


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Our goal is to keep Cult Labs friendly. If you feel discouraged from posting by certain members' behaviour then you can e-mail us in complete confidence.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
All forum posts are contributed by members of the site; Cult Labs cannot take responsibility for all content posted on the site. If you have an issue with content posted on the site please click the 'report post' button.
Copyright © 2014 Cult Laboratories Ltd. All rights reserved.