#611
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Quote:
As for Universal, future acquisitions depend entirely on whether they're happy with existing releases. I can't imagine why they wouldn't be, but the ball's firmly in their court. (This is standard practice for all labels, incidentally - a major-studio rightsholder will initially only grant them access to a small handful of titles just to make sure that they do a decent job with them. If they do, they might get a chance to delve deeper into the catalogue and/or pick up more commercially attractive titles - for instance, Arrow wouldn't have had a hope in hell of getting the likes of Carrie or The Thing five years ago, but now look at them.) |
#612
| ||||
| ||||
i did not realise that Jane seymour was in the sinbad films. i like her a lot and will have to see this.
__________________ |
#613
| ||||
| ||||
|
#614
| ||||
| ||||
Quote: |
#615
| ||||
| ||||
Yes I know. What I meant was if Second Sight can license Studio Canal films,then PH could as well.
__________________ Teddy, I'm a Scotch drinker - you know that. I just have the occasional brandy when I'm not drinking. |
#616
| ||||
| ||||
Nothing confusing about it....
__________________ Teddy, I'm a Scotch drinker - you know that. I just have the occasional brandy when I'm not drinking. |
#617
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
You've answered my question.
__________________ Teddy, I'm a Scotch drinker - you know that. I just have the occasional brandy when I'm not drinking. |
#618
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
#619
| ||||
| ||||
^^^^ out of this freakin' world |
#620
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |