Things you find unbearable in movies - Page 12

Gold6082 · #**111** 19th June 2009, 11:37 AM

Joking or not bad sense of humour!!

the list you left Loops, some titles sound familiar I am sure a friend of mine has some, I'll find out.

vipco · #**112** 19th June 2009, 12:16 PM

Why was Django banned for so long.?

Was it banned up to 93 because of no earlier subs since the original ban or was it problmatic.

Deodato dosent lie. lol Ask him next week.

Pete · #**113** 19th June 2009, 12:19 PM

It was rejected by the bbfc in the 60's and yes im pretty sure no one submitted it until 1993..

vipco · #**114** 19th June 2009, 12:20 PM

Why was Django banned for so long.?

Was it banned up to 93 because of no earlier subs since the original ban or was it problmatic.

Deodato dosent lie. lol Ask him next week unless your way back of the que as he gets prety pissed of getting asked about animals.
Tell him I said Hello and i'll see him later at 'Almars Villa' LOL

Pete · #**115** 19th June 2009, 12:24 PM

I'm not going to ask him about the animals. I might ask him what he thinks of the bbfc cut's to House on the Edge of the Park.

vipco · #**116** 19th June 2009, 12:28 PM

Deodato spent all his childhood summers going to his uncles farm were a pig would be slaughtered when he arrived so he grew up with a farmyard attitude to wards animals, ie animals = Food.

Us city folk think animals are like Disney made em , all cute & cluddly, then a Mouse gets in the house, we see its not like Mickey, so we kill it.

Pete · #**117** 19th June 2009, 12:31 PM

I have quite a few cats ( seven ) and they have often brought mice into house but instead of letting the cat kill it we would rescue the poor thing and release it out the back.

I would never kill anything( not even a bug )

Gold6082 · #**118** 19th June 2009, 12:31 PM

So his films are based on Little House on the prairie meets Animal farm on Speed!!

Angel · #**119** 19th June 2009, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vipco

Why was Django banned for so long.?

Was it banned up to 93 because of no earlier subs since the original ban or was it problmatic.

After its rejection in 1969 it was considered for release again in 1974 but distributors were informed that major cuts would be required for the X rating. And so any plans for a release were shelved. It was submitted again in 1993 and passed with an 18 rating. By this time (25 years on) the film was beginning to look rather tame.

NossB · #**120** 19th June 2009, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loops

I would never kill anything( not even a bug )

Well that's proof (if needed) that you're not Barack Obama