25th September 2013, 11:10 PM
|
| Cult Addict | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Barrow-in-furness | |
Quote:
Originally Posted by gag Yes totally agree, find films like this a bit repulsive when you look back at the films that shocked the film industries and audience years ago and was classed as nasties most are like films for kids compared to stuff like this, films don't go for shock value any more, more of pushing boundries in how sick they can be, not type of film you can REALY watch with you're partner or friends REALY, I have gave 2nd one ne a miss heard its even worse how I'm not sure but I'm getting bored and fed up of these type of films, what happened to good old fashioned horror etc, there's extreme and then just plain wrong.. | There was talk prior to this about Irreversible. I like that film because as harsh as it is I felt it all served a greater purpose as the film reversed away from the violence pain and darkness towards something better. I didn't mind the Hostel films as they were something a little different in American Horror movies when they came out and still more interesting than 99% of the torture porn films that followed. Shock value fades and what came after were left with nothing underneath the shock and don't hold up to repeat viewings, for me this makes them different from films like Cannibal Holocaust, that while repellent in content had something to say.
Tonight I watched Dracula prisoner of Frankenstein. Easy to dislike its very much Jess Franco TM. Lots of Zooms. That said, its a lot more interesting in spite of the otherwise apparent ineptness. Its basically made in the traditions of silent film, there is no real dialogue to speak off through most of the film and it tries its best to tell its story visually. Ends up on the interesting end of the spectrum of Franco films.
|